2025 Senior Competition · Men's Metro 2 North West - 2025
Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. PEGS Hockey Club | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 16 | 46 | 35 | 90% |
2. La Trobe University Hockey Club 1 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50 | 14 | 36 | 32 | 76% |
3. Whittlesea Hockey Club | 14 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 43 | 36 | 7 | 27 | 64% |
4. Melton Hockey Club | 14 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 45 | 31 | 14 | 25 | 60% |
5. Hume Hockey Club | 14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 23 | 19 | 4 | 22 | 52% |
6. Melbourne University Hockey Club | 14 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 40 | 43 | -3 | 19 | 45% |
7. Brunswick Hockey Club | 14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 25 | 34 | -9 | 17 | 40% |
8. Footscray Hockey Club | 14 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 24 | 43 | -19 | 10 | 24% |
9. La Trobe University Hockey Club 2 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 17 | 45 | -28 | 8 | 21% |
10. RMIT Hockey Club | 14 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 17 | 65 | -48 | 6 | 14% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.