2025 Senior Competition · Men's Metro 2 North West - 2025
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. PEGS Hockey Club | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 5 | 32 | 15 | 100% |
| 2. La Trobe University Hockey Club 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 3 | 22 | 15 | 100% |
| 3. Whittlesea Hockey Club | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 12 | 80% |
| 4. Hume Hockey Club | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 9 | 60% |
| 5. Melton Hockey Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 40% |
| 6. Melbourne University Hockey Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 6 | 40% |
| 7. La Trobe University Hockey Club 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 23 | -16 | 4 | 27% |
| 8. Footscray Hockey Club | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 19 | -13 | 3 | 20% |
| 9. RMIT Hockey Club | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 29 | -20 | 3 | 20% |
| 10. Brunswick Hockey Club | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 1 | 7% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.