2025 Senior Competition · Men's Metro 2 North West - 2025
Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. PEGS Hockey Club | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 6 | 34 | 19 | 90% |
2. Whittlesea Hockey Club | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 24 | 13 | 11 | 18 | 86% |
3. La Trobe University Hockey Club 1 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 34 | 9 | 25 | 19 | 79% |
4. Melton Hockey Club | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 12 | 57% |
5. Hume Hockey Club | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 12 | 50% |
6. Melbourne University Hockey Club | 8 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 21 | 26 | -5 | 9 | 38% |
7. La Trobe University Hockey Club 2 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 26 | -15 | 7 | 33% |
8. Brunswick Hockey Club | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 20 | -9 | 7 | 29% |
9. RMIT Hockey Club | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 13 | 39 | -26 | 6 | 25% |
10. Footscray Hockey Club | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 30 | -20 | 3 | 13% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.